e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period-ended June 30, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 0-15495
Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
85-0302351 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
410 North 44th Street, Suite 100,
|
|
85008 |
Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
(Zip code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(602) 685-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On August 2, 2006, the registrant had outstanding 36,267,542 shares of Common Stock.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income |
|
3 |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
3 |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
4 |
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
5 |
Item 2.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
7 |
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
16 |
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
32 |
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors |
|
32 |
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
34 |
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
34 |
Item 4.
|
|
Submission of Matters to Vote for Security Holders |
|
34 |
Item 5.
|
|
Other Information |
|
34 |
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits |
|
34 |
Signatures
|
|
|
|
35 |
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MESA AIR GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger |
|
$ |
331,967 |
|
|
$ |
289,782 |
|
|
$ |
953,034 |
|
|
$ |
801,699 |
|
Freight and other |
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
21,685 |
|
|
|
25,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
339,037 |
|
|
|
298,578 |
|
|
|
974,719 |
|
|
|
827,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations |
|
|
92,927 |
|
|
|
78,295 |
|
|
|
273,625 |
|
|
|
236,633 |
|
Fuel |
|
|
121,990 |
|
|
|
81,426 |
|
|
|
329,996 |
|
|
|
213,734 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
60,849 |
|
|
|
52,302 |
|
|
|
163,993 |
|
|
|
147,836 |
|
Aircraft and traffic servicing |
|
|
20,883 |
|
|
|
17,221 |
|
|
|
55,403 |
|
|
|
51,589 |
|
Promotion and sales |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,335 |
|
|
|
20,022 |
|
|
|
47,240 |
|
|
|
51,211 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,998 |
|
|
|
11,588 |
|
|
|
27,005 |
|
|
|
30,873 |
|
Bankruptcy settlement |
|
|
(9,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Impairment and restructuring charges (credits) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
311,575 |
|
|
|
261,815 |
|
|
|
890,509 |
|
|
|
733,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
27,462 |
|
|
|
36,763 |
|
|
|
84,210 |
|
|
|
93,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,415 |
) |
|
|
(11,555 |
) |
|
|
(27,710 |
) |
|
|
(30,490 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
9,206 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(3,668 |
) |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
(17,995 |
) |
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(9,474 |
) |
|
|
(8,993 |
) |
|
|
(36,499 |
) |
|
|
(25,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
17,988 |
|
|
|
27,770 |
|
|
|
47,711 |
|
|
|
67,841 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
7,059 |
|
|
|
10,635 |
|
|
|
18,502 |
|
|
|
25,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,929 |
|
|
$ |
17,135 |
|
|
$ |
29,209 |
|
|
$ |
41,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MESA AIR GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share |
|
|
|
amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
80,801 |
|
|
$ |
143,428 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
177,161 |
|
|
|
128,162 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
11,726 |
|
|
|
8,848 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
51,023 |
|
|
|
28,956 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Expendable parts and supplies, net |
|
|
32,229 |
|
|
|
36,288 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
127,261 |
|
|
|
98,267 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,245 |
|
|
|
8,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
487,449 |
|
|
|
452,909 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
617,305 |
|
|
|
642,914 |
|
Lease and equipment deposits |
|
|
26,854 |
|
|
|
25,428 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
75,621 |
|
|
|
46,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,207,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
29,397 |
|
|
$ |
27,787 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
82,110 |
|
|
|
54,594 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
52,954 |
|
|
|
52,608 |
|
Air traffic liability |
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
3,829 |
|
Deposit on pending sale of rotable spare parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,750 |
|
Rotable spare parts financing liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,685 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
39,020 |
|
|
|
30,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
215,697 |
|
|
|
216,797 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
549,965 |
|
|
|
636,582 |
|
Deferred credits |
|
|
102,960 |
|
|
|
97,497 |
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
41,174 |
|
|
|
25,684 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
21,190 |
|
|
|
14,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
930,986 |
|
|
|
991,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock of no par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of no par value and additional paid-in capital, 75,000,000 shares authorized;
36,200,769 and 28,868,167 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
166,492 |
|
|
|
96,128 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
109,751 |
|
|
|
80,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
276,243 |
|
|
|
176,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,207,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
MESA AIR GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
29,209 |
|
|
$ |
41,858 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,005 |
|
|
|
30,873 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges (credits) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,501 |
|
|
|
25,816 |
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities |
|
|
4,615 |
|
|
|
(744 |
) |
Amortization of deferred credits |
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
(4,789 |
) |
Amortization of contract incentive payments |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock awards |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit-stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
Debt origination costs written off |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Provision for obsolete expendable parts and supplies |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(4,849 |
) |
|
|
5,890 |
|
Bankruptcy settlement |
|
|
(9,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (purchases) sales of investment securities |
|
|
(53,614 |
) |
|
|
(67,034 |
) |
Receivables |
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
2,870 |
|
Income tax receivables |
|
|
(2,299 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
Expendable parts and supplies |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(28,407 |
) |
|
|
(18,634 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contract incentive payments |
|
|
(20,539 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
18,326 |
|
|
|
(1,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(22,391 |
) |
|
|
6,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(26,531 |
) |
|
|
(32,451 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
18,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
(2,878 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
Net returns (payments) of lease and equipment deposits |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(11,781 |
) |
|
|
(33,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(22,729 |
) |
|
|
(20,399 |
) |
Proceeds from short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,708 |
|
Repayment of financing of rotable spare parts |
|
|
(15,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and issuance of warrants |
|
|
6,011 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
Common stock purchased and retired |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(10,285 |
) |
Proceeds from receipt of deferred credits |
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(28,455 |
) |
|
|
(24,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(62,627 |
) |
|
|
(51,410 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
143,428 |
|
|
|
173,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
80,801 |
|
|
$ |
121,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
27,675 |
|
|
$ |
29,680 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft delivered under interim financing |
|
$ |
27,516 |
|
|
$ |
296,288 |
|
Conversion of convertible debentures to common stock |
|
|
62,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Note receivable received from sale of rotable spare parts |
|
|
18,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory and other credits received in conjunction with aircraft financing |
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rotable spare parts financed with long-term payable |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to aircraft manufacturer for deposits on interim aircraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,591 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
MESA AIR GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements of Mesa Air Group,
Inc. (Mesa or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for a complete set of financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
of the results for the periods presented have been made. Operating results for the three and
nine-month periods ended June 30, 2006, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006. These condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2005.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mesa Air
Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned operating subsidiaries: Mesa Airlines, Inc. (Mesa Airlines), a
Nevada corporation and certificated air carrier; Freedom Airlines, Inc. (Freedom), a Nevada
corporation and certificated air carrier; Air Midwest, Inc. (Air Midwest), a Kansas corporation
and certificated air carrier; MPD, Inc. (MPD), a Nevada corporation, doing business as Mesa Pilot
Development; Regional Aircraft Services, Inc. (RAS) a Pennsylvania corporation; Mesa Leasing,
Inc., a Nevada corporation; Mesa Air Group Airline Inventory Management, LLC (MAG-AIM), an
Arizona Limited Liability Company; Ritz Hotel Management Corp., a Nevada Corporation; and MAGI
Insurance, Ltd. (MAGI), a Barbados, West Indies based captive insurance company. MPD, Inc.
provides pilot training in coordination with a community college in Farmington, New Mexico and with
Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. RAS performs aircraft component repair and overhaul
services and ground handling services. MAG-AIM is an inventory procurement and sales company. MAGI
is a captive insurance company established for the purpose of obtaining more favorable aircraft
liability insurance rates. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. In addition, the Company has launched its inter-island service in
Hawaii under the brand name go! This operation is referred to herein as go!
2. Segment Reporting
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, requires disclosures related to components of a company for
which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by a companys chief
operating decision maker in deciding the allocation of resources and assessing performance. The
Company has three airline operating subsidiaries, Mesa Airlines, Freedom Airlines and Air Midwest,
as well as various other subsidiaries organized to provide support for the Companys airline
operations. In addition, Mesa Airlines began providing inter-island service in Hawaii as go! in the
third quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company has aggregated these subsidiaries into three reportable
segments: Mesa Airlines / Freedom, Air Midwest / go! and Other. Mesa Airlines and Freedom Airlines
operate regional jets and Dash-8 aircraft pursuant to revenue guarantee contracts. Air Midwest
operates the Companys Beech 1900 turboprop aircraft and go! operates regional jets. Air Midwest
and go! assume all revenue risk for their flying. The Other reportable segment includes Mesa Air
Group (the holding company), RAS, MPD, MAG-AIM, MAGI, Mesa Leasing, Inc. and Ritz Hotel Management
Corp., all of which support Mesas operating subsidiaries. In October 2004, the Company
transitioned certain of its regional jets from Freedom into Mesa and transferred a B1900D aircraft
from Air Midwest into Freedom. As a result, Freedom was grouped with Air Midwest in fiscal 2005 for
segment purposes. In fiscal 2006, Freedom began operating under a revenue-guarantee code-share
agreement with Delta utilizing ERJ-145 aircraft that were transitioned from Mesa Airlines. As such,
the Company has aggregated Freedom with Mesa Airlines beginning in the first quarter of fiscal
2006. Operating revenues in the Other segment are primarily sales of rotable and expendable parts
to the Companys operating subsidiaries and ground handling services performed by employees of RAS
for Mesa Airlines.
Mesa Airlines and Freedom Airlines provide passenger service with regional jets under
revenue-guarantee contracts with United Airlines, Inc. (United), Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta)
and US Airways, Inc. (US Airways). Mesa Airlines also provides passenger service with Dash-8
aircraft under revenue-guarantee contracts with US Airways and United. As of June 30, 2006, Mesa
Airlines and Freedom Airlines operated a fleet of 160 aircraft 108 CRJs, 36 ERJs and 16 Dash-8s.
Prior to operating ERJ 145 aircraft, Freedom most recently operated Beechcraft 1900D under a
pro-rate agreement with US Airways.
7
Air Midwest provides passenger service with Beechcraft 1900D aircraft under pro-rate contracts
with US Airways and Midwest Airlines, Inc. (Midwest Airlines) as well as independent operations
as Mesa Airlines. As of June 30, 2006, Air Midwest operated a fleet of 20 Beechcraft 1900D
turboprop aircraft. Mesa Airlines, operating as go!, provides independent inter-island Hawaiian
passenger service with CRJ-200 aircraft. go! operated a fleet of five CRJ-200 as of June 30, 2006.
Air Midwest and Mesa, operating as go!, do not receive contractually-guaranteed revenue for their
operations.
Activity in the Other category consists primarily of sales of rotable and expendable parts and
ground handling services to the Companys operating subsidiaries, but also includes all
administrative functions not directly attributable to any specific operating company. These
administrative costs are allocated to the operating companies based upon specific criteria
including headcount, available seat miles (ASMs) and other operating statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Mesa/ |
|
Air Midwest/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 (000s) |
|
Freedom |
|
go! |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
325,262 |
|
|
$ |
14,247 |
|
|
$ |
68,116 |
|
|
$ |
(68,588 |
) |
|
$ |
339,037 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,710 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,998 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
29,147 |
|
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
|
|
10,618 |
|
|
|
(9,552 |
) |
|
|
27,462 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(7,230 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(2,312 |
) |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(9,415 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
3,609 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
21,778 |
|
|
|
(2,745 |
) |
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
(9,553 |
) |
|
|
17,988 |
|
Income tax (benefit) |
|
|
8,581 |
|
|
|
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
(3,743 |
) |
|
|
7,059 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,386,844 |
|
|
|
13,877 |
|
|
|
481,316 |
|
|
|
(674,808 |
) |
|
|
1,207,229 |
|
Capital expenditures (including non-cash) |
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
10,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Air Midwest/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 (000s) |
|
Mesa |
|
Freedom |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
282,012 |
|
|
$ |
14,052 |
|
|
$ |
75,547 |
|
|
$ |
(73,033 |
) |
|
$ |
298,578 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,590 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
11,588 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
39,244 |
|
|
|
(1,692 |
) |
|
|
10,064 |
|
|
|
(10,853 |
) |
|
|
36,763 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,045 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(11,555 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
784 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
33,201 |
|
|
|
(2,036 |
) |
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
(10,853 |
) |
|
|
27,770 |
|
Income tax (benefit) |
|
|
12,716 |
|
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
(4,157 |
) |
|
|
10,635 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,587,883 |
|
|
|
13,265 |
|
|
|
257,032 |
|
|
|
(405,380 |
) |
|
|
1,452,800 |
|
Capital expenditures (including non-cash) |
|
|
124,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Mesa/ |
|
Air Midwest/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 (000s) |
|
Freedom |
|
go! |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
930,605 |
|
|
$ |
39,855 |
|
|
$ |
172,752 |
|
|
$ |
(168,493 |
) |
|
$ |
974,719 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,084 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,005 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
85,925 |
|
|
|
(5,255 |
) |
|
|
26,742 |
|
|
|
(23,202 |
) |
|
|
84,210 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(19,909 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(8,216 |
) |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
(27,710 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
8,533 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
9,206 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
70,302 |
|
|
|
(5,850 |
) |
|
|
6,462 |
|
|
|
(23,203 |
) |
|
|
47,711 |
|
Income tax (benefit) |
|
|
27,263 |
|
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
(8,998 |
) |
|
|
18,502 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,386,844 |
|
|
|
13,877 |
|
|
|
481,316 |
|
|
|
(674,808 |
) |
|
|
1,207,229 |
|
Capital expenditures (including non-cash) |
|
|
37,662 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Air Midwest/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 (000s) |
|
Mesa |
|
Freedom |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
770,488 |
|
|
$ |
49,663 |
|
|
$ |
223,171 |
|
|
$ |
(216,125 |
) |
|
$ |
827,197 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,656 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
30,873 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
100,630 |
|
|
|
(6,855 |
) |
|
|
32,559 |
|
|
|
(32,877 |
) |
|
|
93,457 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(22,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,800 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
(30,490 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
1,842 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
84,007 |
|
|
|
(7,214 |
) |
|
|
23,925 |
|
|
|
(32,877 |
) |
|
|
67,841 |
|
Income tax (benefit) |
|
|
32,174 |
|
|
|
(2,763 |
) |
|
|
9,163 |
|
|
|
(12,591 |
) |
|
|
25,983 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,587,883 |
|
|
|
13,265 |
|
|
|
257,032 |
|
|
|
(405,380 |
) |
|
|
1,452,800 |
|
Capital expenditures (including non-cash) |
|
|
276,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,739 |
|
3. Marketable Securities
The Company has a cash management program which provides for the investment of excess cash
balances primarily in short-term money market instruments, US treasury securities and
intermediate-term debt instruments.
8
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, requires
that all applicable investments be classified as trading securities, available for sale securities
or held-to-maturity securities. The Company currently has $177.2 million in marketable securities
that include US Treasury notes, government bonds, corporate bonds, short positions on common equity
securities and auction rate securities (ARS). These investments are classified as trading
securities during the periods presented and accordingly, are carried at market value with changes
in value reflected in the current period operations. Unrealized losses relating to trading
securities held at June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, were $4.6 million and $0.5 million,
respectively.
ARS generally have long-term maturities; however, these investments have characteristics
similar to short-term investments because at predetermined intervals, generally every 28 days,
there is a new auction process. As such, the Company classifies ARS as short-term investments. The
balance of marketable securities at June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 includes investments in
ARS of $48.3 million and $46.7 million, respectively.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company entered into a short position on certain
equity securities in order to hedge its exposure to shares expected to be received in connection
with a settlement. The Company marks short positions to market at each reporting period with the
associated gain or loss in value reflected in other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of income.
Included in marketable securities are liabilities related to short positions on common equity
securities of $2.6 million at June 30, 2006. The short position was closed subsequent to June 30,
2006.
4. Restricted Cash
At June 30, 2006, the Company had $11.7 million in restricted cash on deposit with two
financial institutions. In September 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with a financial
institution for a $9.0 million letter of credit facility and to issue letters of credit for landing
fees, workers compensation insurance and other business needs. Pursuant to the agreement, $6.7
million of outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2006 are collateralized by amounts on deposit.
The Company also maintains $5.0 million on deposit with another financial institution to
collateralize its direct deposit payroll obligations.
5. Bankruptcy Settlement
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company determined, based upon publicly available
bankruptcy court documents, that its minimum distribution from its US Airways bankruptcy claim
would be 301,937 shares of US Airways common stock. The Company valued the minimum amount to be
received based upon the closing market price of the stock on June 30, 2006 of $50.54 per share;
applied the expected proceeds to existing receivables and recorded the remaining amount of $9.7
million as a bankruptcy settlement in the condensed consolidated statement of income. On July 11, 2006, the Company
received 351,456 shares of US Airways common stock. The difference between the number of shares
actually received and the amount recorded at June 30, 2006, will be valued at the market price of
the shares on the date of receipt and recorded as a bankruptcy settlement in the fourth quarter.
6. Concentrations
The Company has code-share agreements with US Airways, United, Delta and Midwest Airlines.
Approximately 99% of the Companys consolidated passenger revenue for the three months ended June
30, 2006 was derived from these agreements. Accounts receivable from the Companys code-share
partners were 40% and 35% of total gross accounts receivable at June 30, 2006 and September 30,
2005, respectively.
Prior to the merger of America West and US Airways, US Airways filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection on September 12, 2004. As a result of US Airways emergence from bankruptcy in September
2005 and their non-assumption of the Companys revenue-guarantee code-share agreement, the Company
expanded its regional jet revenue-guarantee code-share agreement with United and entered into a new
revenue-guarantee code-share agreement with Delta. The Company completed the transition of aircraft
from US Airways to United and Delta during the third quarter of fiscal year 2006. In addition, on
September 14, 2005, Delta Air Lines filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy
Code. Delta has not yet assumed the code-share agreement with the Company in its bankruptcy
proceeding and could choose to terminate our regional jet agreement or seek to renegotiate the
agreement on less favorable terms. At June 30, 2006, we operated
twenty-six regional jet aircraft under the Delta agreement.
Non-assumption of the Delta agreement in the bankruptcy proceeding
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
7. Contract Incentives
In May 2005, the Company amended its code-sharing arrangement with United to allow the Company
to put up to an additional 30 50-seat regional jet aircraft into the United Express system. The
agreement with respect to the additional 30 50-seat regional jet aircraft expires in April 2010.
Additionally, the expiration dates under the existing code-share agreement with respect to certain
9
aircraft were extended. The code-share agreement for (i) the ten Dash-8 aircraft terminates in
July 2013, and United Airlines right to terminate earlier will not begin until April 2010, (ii)
the 15 50-seat CRJ-200s currently terminates in April 2010, (iii) the 15 70-seat regional jets (to
be delivered upon the withdrawal of the 50-seat regional jets) terminates on the earlier of ten
years from delivery date or October 2018 and (iv) the remaining 15 70-seat regional jets terminates
in three tranches between December 2011 and December 2013. In connection with the amendment, the
Company made three $10 million payments to United as follows: i) $10 million in June 2005, ii) $10
million in October 2005, and iii) $10 million in November 2005. Amounts paid are recorded as a
deferred charge and included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The deferred charge is being
amortized over the term of the code-share agreement as a reduction of passenger revenue.
Amortization of $1.0 million and $2.5 million was recorded for the three and nine-month periods
ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
8. Sale Leaseback of Rotable Spare Parts
In August 2005, the Company entered into a ten-year agreement with AAR Corp. (the AAR
Agreement), for the management and repair of certain of the Companys CRJ-200, -700, -900 and
ERJ-145 aircraft rotable spare parts inventory. Under the agreement, the Company sold certain
existing spare parts inventory to AAR for $39.5 million in cash and $21.5 million in notes
receivable to be paid over four years. The AAR agreement was contingent upon the Company
terminating an agreement for the Companys CRJ-200 aircraft rotable spare parts inventory with GE
Capital Aviation Services (GECAS) and including these rotables in the arrangement. The Company
terminated the GECAS agreement and finalized the AAR agreement in November 2005. Upon entering into
the agreement, the Company received $22.8 million, which was recorded as a deposit at September 30,
2005, pending the termination of the GECAS agreement. An additional $15.8 million was received in
the quarter ended December 31, 2005. Under the agreement, the Company is required to pay AAR a
monthly fee based upon flight hours for access to and maintenance and servicing of the inventory.
The agreement also contains certain minimum monthly payments that Mesa must make to AAR. Based on
this arrangement, the Company accounts for the transaction as a service agreement and an operating
lease of rotable spare parts with AAR. The sale of the rotable spare parts resulted in a gain of
$2.1 million, which has been deferred and is being recognized over the term of the agreement. At
termination, the Company may elect to purchase the covered inventory at fair value, but is not
contractually obligated to do so.
Future minimum payments under the agreement are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
(In thousands) |
2006 |
|
$ |
5,554 |
|
2007 |
|
|
23,127 |
|
2008 |
|
|
26,650 |
|
2009 |
|
|
29,371 |
|
2010 |
|
|
32,225 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
169,090 |
|
In June 2006, the Company entered into a separate two-year agreement with AAR, for the
management and repair of the Companys CRJ-200 aircraft rotable spare parts inventory associated
with its go! operations. Under the agreement, the Company transferred certain existing spare parts
inventory to AAR for $1.2 million in cash. AAR is required to purchase an additional $2.9 million
in rotable spare parts to support the agreement. Under the agreement, the Company is required to
pay AAR a monthly fee based upon flight hours for access to and maintenance of the inventory. At
termination, the Company has guaranteed the fair value of the underlying rotables. Based on this
arrangement, the Company accounts for the transaction as a financing arrangement, thus recording
both the rotable spare parts inventory as an asset and the related payable to AAR as a liability.
9. Deferred Credits
Deferred credits consist of aircraft purchase incentives provided by the aircraft
manufacturers and deferred gains on the sale and leaseback of interim financed aircraft. These
incentives include credits that may be used to purchase spare parts, pay for training expenses or
reduce other aircraft operating costs. These deferred credits and gains are amortized on a
straight-line basis as a reduction of lease expense over the term of the respective leases.
10. Short-Term Debt
10
The Company had three aircraft on interim financing with the manufacturer at June 30, 2006.
Under interim financing arrangements, the Company takes delivery and title to the aircraft prior to
securing permanent financing and the acquisition of the aircraft is accounted for as a purchase
with debt financing. Accordingly, the Company reflects the aircraft and debt under interim
financing on its condensed consolidated balance sheet during the interim financing period. After taking delivery of the
aircraft, it is the Companys intention to permanently finance the aircraft as an operating lease
through a sale and leaseback transaction with an independent third-party lessor. Upon permanent
financing, the proceeds are used to retire the notes payable to the manufacturer. Any gain
recognized on the sale and leaseback transaction is deferred and amortized over the life of the
lease.
At June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, the Company had $82.1 million and $54.6 million,
respectively, in notes payable to an aircraft manufacturer for aircraft on interim financing. These
interim financings agreements typically have an initial term of six months and provide for monthly
interest only payments at LIBOR plus three percent. The current interim financing agreement with
the manufacturer allows for the Company to have a maximum of 15 aircraft on interim financing at a
given time. Subsequent to June 30, 2006, the Company began making principal payments on these notes
in the amount of $0.1 million per aircraft per month.
11. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Notes payable to bank, collateralized by the underlying aircraft, due 2019 |
|
$ |
334,271 |
|
|
$ |
348,452 |
|
Senior convertible notes due June 2023 |
|
|
37,834 |
|
|
|
100,112 |
|
Senior convertible notes due February 2024 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Notes payable to manufacturer, principal and interest due monthly through 2011 at a
current variable interest rate of 6.07%, collateralized by the underlying aircraft |
|
|
80,855 |
|
|
|
87,947 |
|
Note payable to financial institution due 2013, principal and interest due monthly at
7% per annum through 2008 converting to 12.5% thereafter, collateralized by the
underlying aircraft |
|
|
23,178 |
|
|
|
24,181 |
|
Note payable to manufacturer, principal due semi-annually, interest at 7% due
quarterly through 2007 |
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
Mortgage note payable to bank, principal and interest at 7.5% due monthly through 2009 |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
Other |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
579,362 |
|
|
|
664,369 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(29,397 |
) |
|
|
(27,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
549,965 |
|
|
$ |
636,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2006, holders of $156.8 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity ($62.3
million carrying amount) of the Companys Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 (the Notes) converted
Notes into shares of Mesa common stock. In connection with these conversions, the Company issued an
aggregate of 6,227,845 shares of Mesa common stock in accordance with the terms of these Notes and
also paid approximately $11.3 million to these Noteholders. The Company also wrote off $1.8 million
in debt issue costs related to these notes. Amounts paid to Noteholders and the write-off of debt
issue costs were recorded as Other Expense in the condensed consolidated statement of income. Under the terms
of the Notes, each $1,000 of aggregate principal amount at maturity of Notes is convertible into
39.727 shares of Mesa common stock at the option of the Noteholders under certain circumstances.
The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes have previously been included in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Consequently, issuance of the shares will not be
further dilutive to reported diluted earnings per share.
12. Earnings Per Share
The Company accounts for earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per
Share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted net income per share
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options and warrants were
exercised. In addition, dilutive convertible securities are included in the denominator while
interest on convertible debt, net of tax, is added back to the numerator. A reconciliation of the
numerator and denominator used in computing net income per share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
36,020 |
|
|
|
28,830 |
|
|
|
32,980 |
|
|
|
29,297 |
|
Effect of dilutive outstanding stock options and warrants |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Effect of restricted stock |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
Effect of dilutive outstanding convertible debt |
|
|
10,704 |
|
|
|
16,933 |
|
|
|
10,704 |
|
|
|
16,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
47,461 |
|
|
|
46,154 |
|
|
|
44,710 |
|
|
|
46,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,929 |
|
|
$ |
17,135 |
|
|
$ |
29,209 |
|
|
$ |
41,858 |
|
Interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
|
|
4,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income |
|
$ |
11,829 |
|
|
$ |
18,659 |
|
|
$ |
32,637 |
|
|
$ |
46,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 322,586 and 1,133,663 shares of common stock were outstanding during the
quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, but were excluded from the calculation of
dilutive earnings per share because the options exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive.
13. Stock Repurchase Program
The Companys Board of Directors has authorized the Company to purchase up to 19.4 million
shares of the Companys outstanding common stock, including 10 million shares authorized in
November 2005. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has acquired and retired approximately 8.1 million
shares of its outstanding common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $48.7 million, leaving
approximately 11.3 million shares available for purchase under existing Board authorizations.
Purchases are made at managements discretion based on market conditions and the Companys
financial resources.
The Company repurchased the following shares for $0.5 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
of Shares That |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
May yet be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Announced Plan |
|
the Plan |
June 2006 |
|
|
52,806 |
|
|
$ |
8.84 |
|
|
|
8,112,667 |
|
|
|
11,309,594 |
|
14. Beechcraft 1900D Cost Reductions
On February 7, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Raytheon Aircraft Credit
Company (the Raytheon Agreement) to reduce the operating costs of its Beechcraft 1900D fleet. In
connection with the Raytheon Agreement and subject to the terms and conditions contained therein,
Raytheon agreed to provide up to $5.5 million in annual operating subsidy payments to the Company
contingent upon satisfying certain spending requirements and, among other things, the Company
remaining current on its payment obligations to Raytheon. The amount was subsequently reduced to
$5.2 million as a result of reductions in the Companys fleet of B1900D aircraft. Approximately
$1.3 million was recorded as a reduction to expense during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005. Approximately $3.9 million and $4.0 million was recorded as a reduction to expense during the
nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
In return, the Company granted Raytheon an option to purchase up to 233,068 warrants at a
purchase price of $1.50 per warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of
common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share. At June 30, 2006, Raytheon was vested in all
233,068 warrants and exercised its option to purchase these warrants in prior years.
15. Interest Expense
Included in interest expense on the condensed consolidated statements of income was interest
expense related to aircraft financing of $7.9 million and $8.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $22.0 million and $22.1 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
16. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The changes in the impairment and restructuring charges for the periods ended June 30, 2006
and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
|
Oct. 1, |
|
|
Reversal of |
|
|
Non-Cash |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Non-Cash |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
Description of Charge |
|
2004 |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
2005 |
|
Restructuring: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs to return aircraft |
|
$ |
(2,217 |
) |
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,030 |
) |
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Aircraft lease payments |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,667 |
) |
|
$ |
1,257 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
(1,297 |
) |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
Description of Charge |
|
2005 |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
2005 |
|
Restructuring: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft lease payments |
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. Stockholders Equity
The Company has stock option plans. Prior to October 1, 2005, the Company accounted for these
plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
(APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, as
permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Effective October 1, 2005,
the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payments, using the modified prospective transition method: option awards granted, modified, or
settled after the date of adoption are required to be measured and accounted for in accordance with
SFAS 123(R). Unvested equity-classified awards that were granted prior to the effective date will
continue to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123, and compensation amounts for awards that
vest will now be recognized in the income statement as an expense.
Stock-based compensation cost recognized in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 includes: (a)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to October 1, 2005, based on the grant
date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (b)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to September 30, 2005, based on
the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R).
The Company estimates the fair value of stock awards issued using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Companys stock
and other factors. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee
terminations within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is derived from
historical exercise experience and represents the period of time the Company expects options
granted to be outstanding. The risk-free rates for the periods within the contractual life of the
option are based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. Option
valuation models require the input of subjective assumptions including the expected volatility and
lives. Actual values of grants could vary significantly from the results of the calculations. The
weighted average fair value of options granted during the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 was $6.75. The
weighted average fair value of options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2006 was
$6.53. The following assumptions were used to value stock option grants during the following
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
67.2 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
5.27 |
% |
Forfeiture rate(1) |
|
|
7.57 |
% |
|
|
7.57 |
% |
Expected lives (in years) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), forfeitures were recognized as they occurred. |
Compensation cost for options granted prior to October 1, 2005 was recognized on an
accelerated amortization method over the vesting period of the options. Compensation cost for
options granted after September 30, 2005 was recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period. The following amounts were recognized for stock-based compensation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
General and administrative expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options expense |
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
1,851 |
|
Restricted stock expense |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
695 |
|
|
$ |
2,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
As of June 30, 2006, there was $1.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.9 years.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company presented all tax benefits resulting
from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the condensed consolidated statement
of cash flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits to be
classified as financing cash flows. Excess tax benefits result from tax deductions in excess of the
compensation cost recognized for those options.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the recognition of deferred compensation, a
contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense is no longer
required. Therefore, at October 1, 2005, Unearned compensation on restricted stock was combined
with Common stock of no par value and additional paid-in capital in the Companys condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
The Company applied the provision of APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in
accounting for its stock-based compensation plans prior to October 1, 2005. Accordingly, no
compensation cost was recognized for awards made pursuant to its stock option plans. Had the
compensation cost for the Companys stock-based compensation plans been determined consistent with
the measurement provision of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and
Disclosure, the Companys net income and net income per share would have been as indicated by the
pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
17,135 |
|
|
$ |
41,858 |
|
Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
41,218 |
|
Interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
4,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted pro forma net income |
|
$ |
18,345 |
|
|
$ |
45,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of award activity under the stock option plans as of June 30, 2006 and changes
during the three and nine month periods then ended are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
(000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
7.16 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
$ |
7.04 |
|
Granted |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
10.59 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
5.09 |
|
Canceled/Forfeited |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
$ |
7.17 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
$ |
7.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has 2,080,134 fully vested options outstanding as of June 30, 2006, which have a
weighted average exercise price of $7.17, an aggregate intrinsic value of $9.1 million and a
weighted average remaining contractual term of 4.5 years. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.4 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. The total
14
intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine-month periods ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $4.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
A summary of the activity for nonvested share awards as of June 30, 2006 and changes during
the three and nine month periods then ended are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
(000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000) |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at beginning of period |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
Granted |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
7.21 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
7.21 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at end of period |
|
|
744 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Commitments and Contingencies
In May 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division
(BRAD) under which the Company has an option to acquire 80 CRJ-700 and CRJ-900 regional jets. In
January 2004, the Company converted options on 20 CRJ-900 aircraft to firm orders (seven of which
can be converted to CRJ-700s). As of June 30, 2006, the Company has taken delivery of 13 CRJ-900
aircraft under the converted options. In conjunction with this purchase agreement, Mesa had $16.0
million on deposit with BRAD that was included in lease and equipment deposits at June 30, 2006.
The BRAD deposits are expected to be returned upon completion of permanent financing on each of the
last five aircraft on order ($3.0 million per aircraft) and $1.0 million at the Companys option.
In February 2006, Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a complaint against the Company
in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Hawaii (the Bankruptcy Court) alleging
that the Company breached the terms of a Confidentiality Agreement entered into in April 2004 with
the Trustee in Hawaiians bankruptcy proceedings. Hawaiians complaint alleges, among other things,
that the Company breached the Confidentiality Agreement by (a) using the evaluation material to
obtain a competitive advantage over Hawaiian, through the development and implementation of a
business plan to compete with Hawaiian in the inter-island market, and (b) failing to return or
destroy any evaluation materials after being notified by Hawaiian on or about May 12, 2004 that the
Company had not been selected as a potential investor for a transaction with Hawaiian. Hawaiian, in
its complaint, seeks unspecified damages, requests that the Company turn over to Hawaiian any
evaluation material in the Companys possession, custody or control (the Turnover Claim), and an
injunction preventing the Company from providing inter-island transportation services in the State
of Hawaii for a period of two years from the date of such injunctive relief.
The Company vigorously denies Hawaiians allegations and requests for relief contained in its
complaint. In addition to answering Hawaiians complaint, the Company filed a counterclaim
containing three counts against Hawaiian. The Bankruptcy Court dismissed two of these counts, but
the Companys primary allegation that Hawaiians lawsuit against Mesa is itself an anticompetitive
act in violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act remains. Although the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii (the District Court) denied the Companys initial efforts to
immediately withdraw the entire lawsuit from the Bankruptcy Court to the District Court, the
District Court indicated that it may later withdraw the lawsuit or the Companys counterclaim prior
to a trial. A trial is scheduled for April 2, 2007.
In May 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Turnover Claim contained in Hawaiians
complaint. The Bankruptcy Court denied the Companys motion to dismiss the Turnover Claim. The
Company does not believe that this denial has a material impact on the Companys position in the
lawsuit.
In June 2006, Hawaiian requested a preliminary injunction to prevent the Company from issuing
new airline tickets for the Hawaiian inter-island market for a period of one year. In this request,
Hawaiian alleges that initial discovery conducted reveals that the Company breached the
Confidentiality Agreement. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend
against Hawaiians request for a preliminary injunction. If Hawaiian is successful in obtaining a
preliminary injunction, however, the Companys inter-island operations in Hawaii will effectively
cease for one year. A hearing in this regard is scheduled for September 15, 2006.
15
In the event a preliminary injunction is issued in favor of Hawaiian, the Company believes the
cessation and winding down of its operations in Hawaii could have an adverse impact on its
financial condition or results of operations for a period of approximately six months following
such event. The litigation and claims noted above are subject to inherent uncertainties and the
Companys view of such matters may change in the future.
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings and FAA civil action proceedings
that the Company does not believe will have a material adverse effect upon the Companys business,
financial condition or results of operations, although no assurance can be given to the ultimate
outcome of any such proceedings.
19. Subsequent Event
In July 2006, the Company, through a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary, contributed $15
million to the capital of a limited liability company. The purpose of the limited liability company
is to make certain strategic investments.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is
relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Companys results of operations and financial
condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
and the related notes thereto, and the Selected Financial Data and Operating Data contained
elsewhere herein.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements including, but not limited to,
information regarding the replacement, deployment, and acquisition of certain numbers and types of
aircraft, and projected expenses associated therewith; costs of compliance with Federal Aviation
Administration regulations and other rules and acts of Congress; the passing of taxes, fuel costs,
inflation, and various expenses to the consumer; the relocation of certain operations of Mesa; the
resolution of litigation in a favorable manner and certain projected financial obligations. These
statements, in addition to statements made in conjunction with the words expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, believe, seek, estimate, and similar expressions, are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Safe Harbor provision of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These
statements relate to future events or the future financial performance of Mesa and only reflect
managements expectations and estimates. The following is a list of factors, among others, that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: changing
business conditions in certain market segments and industries; changes in Mesas code-sharing
relationships; the inability of US Airways, Delta Air Lines or United Airlines to pay their
obligations under the code-share agreements; the ability of Delta Air Lines to reject our
code-share agreements in bankruptcy; the inability to transition the planes we currently fly under
our code-share agreement with Pre-Merger US Airways without undue cost and expense; an increase in
competition along the routes Mesa operates or plans to operate; the inability to profitably operate our
Hawaiian airline service; material delays in completion by the
manufacturer of the ordered and yet-to-be delivered aircraft; availability and cost of funds for
financing new aircraft; changes in general economic conditions; changes in fuel prices; changes in
regional economic conditions; changes in Mesas relationship with employees and the terms of future
collective bargaining agreements; the impact of current and future laws; additional terrorist
attacks; Congressional investigations, and governmental regulations affecting the airline industry
and Mesas operations; bureaucratic delays; amendments to existing legislation; consumers unwilling
to incur greater costs for flights; unfavorable resolution of negotiations with municipalities for
the leasing of facilities; and risks associated with the outcome of litigation. One or more of
these or other factors may cause Mesas actual results to differ materially from any
forward-looking statement. Mesa is not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements contained in this Form 10-Q.
All references to we, our, us, or Mesa refer to Mesa Air Group, Inc. and its
predecessors, direct and indirect subsidiaries and affiliates.
Investors should read the risks identified under Item 1.A. Risk Factors above for a more
detailed discussion of these and other factors.
GENERAL
16
Executive Overview
General
Mesa is a holding company whose principle subsidiaries operate as regional air carriers
providing scheduled passenger and airfreight service. As of June 30, 2006, we served 173 cities in
46 states, the District of Columbia, Canada and Mexico and operated a fleet of 185 aircraft with
approximately 1,200 daily departures.
Approximately 99% of our consolidated passenger revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
was derived from operations associated with code-share agreements. Our subsidiaries have code-share
agreements with US Airways, United Airlines, Delta Air Lines and Midwest Airlines. Our remaining
passenger revenues are derived from our independent operations.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, approximately 97% of our passenger revenue was associated
with revenue-guarantee flying. The US Airways (regional jet and Dash-8), United (regional jet and
Dash-8), and Delta (regional jet) code-share agreements are revenue-guarantee flying agreements.
Under the terms of these flying agreements, the major carrier controls marketing, scheduling,
ticketing, pricing and seat inventories. Our role is simply to operate our fleet in the safest and
most reliable manner in exchange for fees paid under a generally fixed payment schedule. We receive
a guaranteed payment based upon a fixed minimum monthly amount plus amounts related to departures
and block hours flown in addition to direct reimbursement of expenses such as fuel, landing fees
and insurance. We are also eligible to receive additional compensation based upon our performance
under certain of our revenue-guarantee contracts. Among other advantages, revenue-guarantee
arrangements reduce our exposure to fluctuations in passenger traffic and fare levels, as well as
fuel prices. In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, approximately 98% of our fuel purchases were
reimbursed under revenue-guarantee code-share agreements.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, approximately 3% of our passenger revenue was associated
with pro-rate and independent flying. The US Airways (Beechcraft 1900D turboprop) and Midwest
Airlines code-share agreements are pro-rate agreements, for which we received an allocated portion
of each passengers fare and we pay all of the costs of transporting the passenger.
In addition to carrying passengers, we carry freight and express packages on our passenger
flights and have interline small cargo freight agreements with many other carriers. We also have
contracts with the U.S. Postal Service for carriage of mail to the cities we serve and occasionally
operate charter flights when our aircraft are not otherwise used for scheduled service.
Fleet
In June 2006, we began taking delivery of Dash-8 aircraft that will be flown by Freedom
Airlines beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 under a new agreement with Delta in support of their expanding operations at their New
York-JFK hub.
Also in June 2006, we launched our independent, inter-island Hawaii service under the brand
name go!, with three aircraft and doubled our schedule on June 30th when we added two additional
aircraft. In June, go! had an overall completion factor of 100%, an on time arrival rate of 88.9%,
and a load factor of 82.5%.
We also completed the transition of our 59 regional jets out of the US Airways operations into
operation with United and Delta by placing 30 aircraft into revenue service with United (net of
three lease returns) and 26 aircraft into revenue service with Delta. We are contractually
committed to placing an additional four 50-seat regional jets into operation with Delta and expect
to do so in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Code-Share Agreements
Freedom commenced operations with Delta in October 2005 and is contracted to operate 30
50-seat regional jet aircraft on routes throughout Deltas network. However, Delta has not yet
assumed our code-share agreement in its bankruptcy proceedings and could choose to terminate our
agreement at any time prior to its emergence from bankruptcy. The Company currently operates 26
ERJ-145 regional aircraft in revenue service for Delta.
In May 2005, we amended our code-sharing arrangement with United to allow us to put up to an
additional 30 50-seat regional jet aircraft into the United Express system and extend the
expiration dates under the existing code-share agreement with respect to certain
17
aircraft. In
connection with the amendment, we made $20 million in payments to United in the first quarter of
fiscal 2006. We currently operate 72 aircraft in revenue service for United.
Summary of Financial Results
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Mesa Air Group recorded consolidated operating revenue of
$339.0 million, representing an increase of $40.4 million, or 13.6%, from $298.6 million in the
quarter of the prior year. The Company also recorded consolidated net income of $10.9 million in
the third quarter of fiscal 2006, representing diluted earnings per share of $0.25. This compares
to consolidated net income of $17.1 million or $0.40 per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
Operationally, the Company increased the number of aircraft in its fleet from 182 at June 30,
2005 to 185 at June 30, 2006. Despite increasing the number of aircraft in service, both ASM and
block hours decreased quarter over quarter as a result of aircraft being out of service while
transitioning from the US Airways system into the United and Delta systems.
The following tables set forth quarterly comparisons for the periods indicated below:
OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
Passengers |
|
|
3,901,480 |
|
|
|
3,492,971 |
|
|
|
10,832,397 |
|
|
|
9,567,626 |
|
Available seat miles (000s) |
|
|
2,288,200 |
|
|
|
2,352,514 |
|
|
|
6,781,886 |
|
|
|
6,363,062 |
|
Revenue passenger miles (000s) |
|
|
1,820,001 |
|
|
|
1,677,974 |
|
|
|
5,074,883 |
|
|
|
4,491,608 |
|
Load factor |
|
|
79.5 |
% |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
|
|
74.8 |
% |
|
|
70.6 |
% |
Yield per revenue passenger mile (cents) |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Revenue per available seat mile (cents) |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Operating cost per available seat mile (cents) |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Operating cost per available seat mile, excluding fuel (cents) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Average stage length (miles) |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Number of operating aircraft in fleet |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Gallons of fuel consumed (000s) |
|
|
52,811 |
|
|
|
52,718 |
|
|
|
154,524 |
|
|
|
149,003 |
|
Block hours flown |
|
|
141,515 |
|
|
|
148,093 |
|
|
|
419,113 |
|
|
|
423,851 |
|
Departures |
|
|
95,949 |
|
|
|
100,954 |
|
|
|
282,913 |
|
|
|
291,034 |
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Costs per |
|
% of Total |
|
Costs per |
|
% of Total |
|
Costs per |
|
% of Total |
|
Costs per |
|
% of Total |
|
|
ASM (cents) |
|
Revenues |
|
ASM (cents) |
|
Revenues |
|
ASM (cents) |
|
Revenues |
|
ASM (cents) |
|
Revenues |
Flight operations |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
% |
Fuel |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
Maintenance |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
Aircraft and traffic
servicing |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Promotion and sales |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
General and
administrative |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Bankruptcy settlement |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
-2.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Impairment and
restructuring charges
(credits) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Note: numbers in table may not recalculate due to rounding
18
FINANCIAL DATA BY OPERATING SEGMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mesa/Freedom |
|
|
/go! |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Total |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
325,262 |
|
|
$ |
14,247 |
|
|
$ |
68,116 |
|
|
$ |
(68,588 |
) |
|
$ |
339,037 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
296,115 |
|
|
|
16,998 |
|
|
|
57,498 |
|
|
|
(59,036 |
) |
|
|
311,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
29,147 |
|
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
|
|
10,618 |
|
|
|
(9,552 |
) |
|
|
27,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 (000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mesa |
|
|
/Freedom |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Total |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
282,012 |
|
|
$ |
14,052 |
|
|
$ |
75,547 |
|
|
$ |
(73,033 |
) |
|
$ |
298,578 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
242,768 |
|
|
|
15,744 |
|
|
|
65,483 |
|
|
|
(62,180 |
) |
|
|
261,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
39,244 |
|
|
|
(1,692 |
) |
|
|
10,064 |
|
|
|
(10,853 |
) |
|
|
36,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2006 (000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mesa/Freedom |
|
|
/go! |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Total |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
930,605 |
|
|
$ |
39,855 |
|
|
$ |
172,752 |
|
|
$ |
(168,493 |
) |
|
$ |
974,719 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
844,680 |
|
|
|
45,110 |
|
|
|
146,010 |
|
|
|
(145,291 |
) |
|
|
890,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
85,925 |
|
|
|
(5,255 |
) |
|
|
26,742 |
|
|
|
(23,202 |
) |
|
|
84,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005 (000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mesa |
|
|
/Freedom |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Total |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
770,488 |
|
|
$ |
49,663 |
|
|
$ |
223,171 |
|
|
$ |
(216,125 |
) |
|
$ |
827,197 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
669,858 |
|
|
|
56,518 |
|
|
|
190,612 |
|
|
|
(183,248 |
) |
|
|
733,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
100,630 |
|
|
|
(6,855 |
) |
|
|
32,559 |
|
|
|
(32,877 |
) |
|
|
93,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended June 30, 2006 versus the three months ended June 30, 2005
Operating Revenues
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, operating revenue increased by $40.4 million, or 13.6%,
from $298.6 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 to $339.0 million in the quarter ended June
30, 2006. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to a $40.6 million increase in fuel
reimbursements by our code-share partners at Mesa / Freedom compared to the quarter ended June 30,
2005. Under our revenue-guarantee code-share agreements, certain expenses such as fuel are a direct
pass-through to our partners. As a result, any increase in the unit cost of these expenses results
in a corresponding increase in revenues. Revenue at Air Midwest / go! increased $0.2 million with
increases in passenger revenue of $0.7 million offsetting a decrease in Essential Air Service
(EAS) revenue of $0.5 million. The increase in passenger revenue primarily was due to the launch
of go! in June 2006. The decrease in EAS revenue is due to reductions in the number of cities
served under the program.
Operating Expenses
Flight Operations
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, flight operations expense increased $14.6 million, or
18.7%, to $92.9 million from $78.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis,
flight operations expense increased 24.2% to 4.1 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2006
from 3.3 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2005. At Mesa / Freedom, flight operations
expense increased $16.2 million primarily due to a $8.6 million increase in aircraft lease costs as
a result of permanently financing 15 CRJ-900 aircraft as operating leases in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2005. Other increases include a $3.6 million increase in pilot and flight attendant wages, a
$1.5 million increase in simulator rental fees and a $0.6 million increase in crew lodging
expenses. These increases are due to the additional regional jets in service and training costs
associated with moving pilots from the Mesa certificate to the Freedom certificate as a result of
the transition of aircraft from US Airways to Delta. These costs were partially offset by reduced
flight operations expense in the other segment of $1.0 million, which was primarily due to
increased amortization of deferred credits, which reduced flight operations expense.
19
Fuel
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fuel expense increased $40.6 million, or 49.8%, to $122.0
million from $81.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis, fuel expense
increased 51.4% to 5.3 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from 3.5 cents per ASM in
the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Into-plane fuel cost in the second quarter increased 50% from
$1.54 per gallon in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 to $2.31 per gallon in the third quarter of
fiscal 2006, resulting in a $40.3 million unfavorable price variance. Consumption was flat quarter
over quarter resulting in a $0.2 million unfavorable volume variance (excluding fuel used in other
operations). In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, approximately 98% of our fuel costs were
reimbursed by our code-share partners.
Maintenance Expense
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, maintenance expense increased $8.5 million, or 16.3%, to
$60.8 million from $52.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis, maintenance
expense increased 22.7% to 2.7 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from 2.2 cents per
ASM in the quarters ended June 30, 2005. At Mesa / Freedom, maintenance expense increased $11.9
million. Included in the increase was a $4.3 million increase in the cost of airframe checks due to
timing these checks with aircraft transitions from the US Airways
system into the United and Delta systems, a $2.0 million increase in rotable repair contract
expenses as a result of moving rotables for both the CRJ-700/900 fleet and the ERJ-145 fleet into
these programs as part of the AAR sale in November 2005. Other increases included a $1.6 million
increase in other repair expenses, a $1.2 million increase in expendable part usage, a $1.1 million
increase in wages and benefits and a $1.0 million increase in facilities rent expense. These
increases were offset by a $2.6 million decrease in the Other category related to a
reduction in inventory management fees.
Aircraft and Traffic Servicing
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, aircraft and traffic servicing expense increased by $3.7
million, or 21.3%, to $20.9 million from $17.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an
ASM basis, aircraft and traffic servicing expense increased 28.6% to 0.9 cents per ASM in the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 from 0.7 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The increase
was primarily due to a $3.6 million increase at Mesa / Freedom; which was comprised of a $1.7
million increase in common use baggage expenses, $0.5 million increase in landing fees, $0.4
million increase in commissary expenses, $0.4 million increase in TSA security costs and a $0.4
million increase in baggage delivery costs. These increases were
primarily driven by the transition
of aircraft out of the US Airways hubs on the east coast into higher
costing United and Delta hubs.
Promotion and Sales
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, promotion and sales expense increased by $0.3 million, or
38.9%, to $1.3 million from $1.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis,
promotion and sales expense increased from $0.0 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 to
$0.1 cent per ASM for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The net increase in promotional expenses was
due to a $0.3 million increase at Air Midwest / go! The increase was comprised of $0.6 million in
promoting the launch of new inter-island Hawaiian service under the brand name go! The increase was
offset by a $0.3 million decrease in booking and franchise fees paid under our pro-rate agreements
with our code-share partners caused by a decline in passengers carried under these agreements as a
result of capacity reductions. We do not pay these fees under our regional jet revenue-guarantee
contracts.
General and Administrative
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, general and administrative expense decreased $5.7 million,
or 28.4%, to $14.3 million from $20.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis,
general and administrative expense decreased 33.3% to 0.6 cents per ASM in quarter ended June 30,
2006 from 0.9 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The net decrease included
reductions in bad debt expense of $7.4 million, medical insurance premium expenses of $2.0 million
and compensation expense of $1.3 million. The reduction in bad debt expense was due to the reversal
of allowances for receivables from the bankrupt US Airways as a
result of the settlement of our bankruptcy claims. The reduction in medical premiums expense was due to the impact of increased employee
contributions. The reduction in compensation expense was due to reduced bonuses being accrued in
the third quarter of fiscal 2006, compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2005. These reductions
were offset by increases in workers compensation expense of $2.6 million, personal property tax
expense of $1.0 million and a $0.4 million increase in stock option expense as a result of the
adoption of FASB 123(R). The increase in workers compensation expense is a result of higher loss
development factors used to compute reserves. The increase in personal property tax expense was due
to increases in our fleet of jet aircraft.
20
Depreciation and Amortization
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $2.6
million, or 22.4%, to $9.0 million from $11.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an
ASM basis, depreciation expense decreased 20% to 0.4 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30,
2006 from 0.5 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The decrease is primarily due to a
$2.5 million reduction in depreciation expense at Mesa / Freedom as a result of permanently
financing 15 CRJ-900 aircraft as operating leases in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
Bankruptcy Settlement
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company determined that it would be receiving a
minimum of $15.3 million in value from US Airways as a settlement of its bankruptcy claim. As a result, we
applied the expected proceeds to existing receivables and recorded the remaining amount of $9.7
million as a bankruptcy settlement.
Interest Expense
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, interest expense decreased $2.2 million, or 18.5%, to $9.4
million from $11.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis, interest expense
decreased 20% to 0.4 cents per ASM in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from 0.5 cents per ASM in the
quarter ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in interest expense is primarily due a $4.7 million
reduction in interest expense as a result of permanently financing 15 CRJ-900 aircraft with
operating leases in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, a $1.0 million reduction in convertible debt
interest expense as a result of the conversion from debt to equity and a $0.3 million reduction in
interest expense related to the financing of rotable inventory that was retired in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006. These decreases were partially offset by a $3.9 million increase in
interest expense on aircraft financing as a result of increases in variable interest rates.
Interest Income
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, interest income increased $2.8 million to $3.6 million
from $0.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The increase is due to increases in the
rates of return on our portfolio of marketable securities.
Other Income (Expense)
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, other income (expense) decreased $5.4 million from income
of $1.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 to expense of ($3.7) million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006. In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, other income (expense) is primarily
comprised of $3.5 million in unrealized losses on investment securities.
In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, other income (expense) is primarily comprised of
investment income of $1.9 million.
Income Taxes
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, income tax expense decreased $3.5 million, or 33.6%, to
$7.1 million from $10.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The effective tax rate
increased from 38.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 to 39.2% for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 mainly as a result of increased flying in states with higher tax rates.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2006 versus the nine months ended June 30, 2005
Operating Revenues
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, operating revenue increased by $147.5 million, or
17.8%, from $827.2 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2005 to $974.7 million in the nine
months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to a $160.1 million
increase in passenger revenue at Mesa / Freedom. The increase includes a $120.6 million increase in
fuel reimbursements by our code-share partners compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Under
our revenue-guarantee code-share agreements, certain expenses such as fuel are a direct
pass-through to our partners. As a result, any increase in the unit cost of these expenses results
in a corresponding increase in revenues. Also included in the increase in revenue is $37.8 million
in revenue associated with the operation of seven additional regional jets flown by Mesa / Freedom
compared to the nine months ended June 30,
21
2005. This increase was partially offset by a net decrease in revenue of approximately $9.8
million at Air Midwest / go! The decrease in revenue at Air Midwest / go! was primarily comprised
of a $6.9 million net decrease in passenger revenue and a $2.8 million decrease in EAS subsidies.
The decrease in passenger revenue was due to reduced Beechcraft 1900D capacity from 24 aircraft as
of June 30, 2005 to 20 aircraft as of June 30, 2006 as a result of leasing these aircraft to other
carriers. The decrease in EAS revenue is due to reductions in the number of cities served under the
program.
Operating Expenses
Flight Operations
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, flight operations expense increased $37.0 million, or
15.6%, to $273.6 million from $236.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM
basis, flight operations expense increased 8.1% to 4.0 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June
30, 2006 from 3.7 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2005. At Mesa / Freedom, flight
operations expense increased $44.3 million primarily due to a $27.3 million increase in aircraft
lease costs as a result of permanently financing 15 CRJ-900 aircraft as operating leases in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. Other increases include a $9.6 million increase in pilot and flight
attendant wages, a $2.1 million increase in simulator rental fees and a $1.7 million increase in
crew lodging expenses. These increases are due to the additional regional jets in service, training
costs associated with moving pilots from the Mesa certificate to the Freedom certificate as a
result the transition of aircraft from US Airways to Delta. These costs were partially offset by
reduced flight operations expense in the other segment of $3.0 million, which was primarily due to
increased amortization of deferred credits, which reduced flight operations expense.
Fuel
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, fuel expense increased $116.3 million, or 54.4%, to
$330.0 million from $213.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis, fuel
expense increased 44.1% to 4.9 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from 3.4 cents
per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2005. Into-plane fuel cost in the nine months ended June
30, 2006 increased 49% from $1.43 per gallon in the nine months ended June 30, 2005 to $2.13 per
gallon in the nine months ended June 30, 2006, resulting in a $104.3 million unfavorable price
variance. Consumption increased 4% in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 resulting in a $11.8
million unfavorable volume variance (excluding fuel used in other operations). In the nine months
ended June 30, 2006, approximately 98% of our fuel costs were reimbursed by our code-share
partners.
Maintenance Expense
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, maintenance expense increased $16.2 million, or 10.9%,
to $164.0 million from $147.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis,
maintenance expense increased 4.3% to 2.4 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from
2.3 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2005. At Mesa / Freedom, maintenance expense
increased $24.7 million. Included in the increase was a $8.3 million increase in the cost of
airframe checks due to timing these checks with aircraft transitions
from the US Airways system into the United and Delta systems, a $6.1 million increase in
rotable repair contract expenses as a result of moving rotables for both the CRJ-700/900 fleet and
the ERJ-145 fleet into these programs as part of the AAR sale in November 2005. Other increases
included a $3.0 million increase in other repair expenses, a $1.2 million increase in wages and
benefits and a $2.0 million increase in facilities rent expense. Offsetting these increases was a
$1.1 million decrease in expendable part usage primarily due to
timing of airframe checks. These increases were offset by a $5.7 million decrease at Air Midwest as a result of
increased maintenance in fiscal 2005 (incurred to prepare aircraft for lease) and a $2.9 million
decrease in the other category related to a reduction in inventory management fees.
Aircraft and Traffic Servicing
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, aircraft and traffic servicing expense increased by
$3.8 million, or 7.4%, to $55.4 million from $51.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005.
On an ASM basis, aircraft and traffic servicing expense remained the same at 0.8 cents per ASM in
the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 0.8 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2005.
The increase was primarily due to a $5.5 million increase at Mesa / Freedom; which was comprised of
a $2.7 million increase in common use baggage expenses, $1.5 million increase in landing fees, $1.3
million increase in TSA security costs and a $1.0 million increase in baggage delivery costs. These
increases were offset by a $1.2 million decrease in wage and related benefit costs. The increases
were primarily driven by the transition of aircraft out of the US Airways hubs on the east coast
into higher costing United and Delta hubs. The decrease in wages and benefits is due to
outsourcing gate and ramp services to other carriers. The
22
increase at Mesa / Freedom was offset by a $1.7 million decrease at Air Midwest / go!,
primarily a result of reductions in capacity (leasing aircraft to other carriers).
Promotion and Sales
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, promotion and sales expense decreased by $0.1 million,
or 4.2%, to $3.0 million from $3.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM
basis, promotion and sales expense equates to less than $0.1 cent. The net decrease in promotional
expenses was in the Air Midwest / go! segment, where amounts spent promoting the launch of new inter-island Hawaiian service under the brand name go! were offset by a decrease in booking and franchise fees paid under our
pro-rate agreements with our code-share partners caused by a decline in passengers carried under
these agreements as a result of capacity reductions. We do not pay these fees under our regional
jet revenue-guarantee contracts.
General and Administrative
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, general and administrative expense decreased $4.0
million, or 7.8%, to $47.2 million from $51.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. On
an ASM basis, general and administrative expense decreased 12.5% to 0.7 cents per ASM in nine
months ended June 30, 2006 from 0.8 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2005. The net
decrease included reductions in bad debt expense of $10.7 million, medical insurance premium
expenses of $2.4 million and compensation expense of $1.4 million. The reduction in bad debt
expense was primarily due to the reversal of allowances for receivables from the bankrupt US
Airways as a result of the settlement of our bankruptcy claims. The reduction in medical premiums expense was due
to the impact of increased employee contributions. The reduction in compensation expense was due to
reduced bonuses being accrued in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, compared to the third quarter of
fiscal 2005. These reductions were offset by increases in workers compensation expense of $3.3
million, personal property tax expense of $3.1 million and a $1.9 million increase in stock option
expense as a result of the adoption of FASB 123(R). The increase in workers compensation expense is
a result of higher loss development factors used to compute reserves. The increase in personal
property tax expense was due to increases in our fleet of jet aircraft.
Depreciation and Amortization
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $3.9
million, or 12.5%, to $27.0 million from $30.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. On
an ASM basis, depreciation expense decreased 20% to 0.4 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June
30, 2006 from 0.5 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily
due to a $3.9 million reduction in depreciation expense at Mesa / Freedom as a result of
permanently financing 15 CRJ-900 aircraft as operating leases in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
Bankruptcy Settlement
In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company determined that it would be receiving a
minimum of $15.3 million in value from US Airways as a settlement of its bankruptcy claim. As a result, we
applied the expected proceeds to existing receivables and recorded the remaining amount of $9.7
million as a bankruptcy settlement.
Impairment and Restructuring Charges (Credits)
In the nine months ended June 30, 2005, we reversed $1.3 million in reserves for lease and
lease return costs related to two Shorts 360 aircraft that we returned to the lessor in January
2005.
Interest Expense
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, interest expense decreased $2.8 million, or 9.1%, to
$27.7 million from $30.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. On an ASM basis, interest
expense decreased 20% to 0.4 cents per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from 0.5 cents
per ASM in the nine months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in interest expense is primarily due a
$7.0 million reduction in interest expense as a result of permanently financing 15 CRJ-900 aircraft
with operating leases in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, a $1.8 million reduction in convertible
debt interest expense as a result of the conversion from debt to equity and a $0.7 million
reduction in interest expense related to the financing of rotable inventory that was retired in the
first quarter
23
of fiscal 2006. These decreases were partially offset by a $6.9 million increase in interest
expense on aircraft financing as a result of increases in variable interest rates.
Interest Income
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, interest income increased $7.4 million to $9.2 million
from $1.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. The increase is due to increases in the
rates of return on our portfolio of marketable securities.
Other Income (Expense)
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, other income (expense) decreased $21.0 million from
income of $3.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 to an expense of $18.0 million for
the nine months ended June 30, 2006. In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, other income (expense)
is primarily comprised of $13.1 million of debt conversion costs and $4.3 million in losses on
investment securities.
In the nine months ended June 30, 2005, other income (expense) is primarily comprised of
investment income of $4.0 million, $2.4 million in insurance proceeds on the Companys EMB120
aircraft and $1.0 million in income from a settlement of a dispute with a vendor, offset by $4.1
million in lease return costs on the EMB120s.
Income Taxes
In the nine months ended June 30, 2006, income tax expense decreased $7.5 million, or 28.8%,
to $18.5 million from $26.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. The effective tax rate
increased from 38.3% for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 to 38.8% for the nine months ended
June 30, 2006 mainly as a result of increased flying in states with higher tax rates.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources and Uses of Cash
At June 30, 2006, we had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (including
restricted cash) of $269.7 million, compared to $280.4 million at September 30, 2005. Our cash and
cash equivalents and marketable securities are intended to be used for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, and to fund our obligations with respect to regional jet deliveries.
Sources of cash included $26.6 million provided from operations (excluding $53.6 million in
net purchases and $4.6 million in unrealized losses on marketable securities), $18.7 million from the sale of
assets including the sale and leaseback of rotable parts and $6.0 million from exercise of stock
options.
Uses of cash included $15.9 million to retire our financing obligation for rotable spare
parts, principal payments of $22.7 million and capital expenditures of $26.5 million attributable
to the expansion of our regional jet fleet and related provisioning of rotable inventory to support
the additional jets.
As of June 30, 2006, we had receivables of approximately $51.0 million (net of an allowance
for doubtful accounts of $3.9 million), compared to receivables of approximately $29.0 million (net
of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $8.9 million) as of September 30, 2005. The amounts due
consist primarily of receivables due from our code-share partners, subsidy payments due from
Raytheon, Federal excise tax refunds on fuel, insurance proceeds, the bankruptcy settlement,
proceeds from the sale of inventory, manufacturers credits, credit card holdback amounts and
passenger ticket receivables due through the Airline Clearing House. Accounts receivable from our
code-share partners was 40% of total gross accounts receivable at June 30, 2006.
Code-Share Partner in Bankruptcy
On September 14, 2005, Delta Air Lines filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the US
Bankruptcy Code. Delta has not yet assumed our code-share agreement in its bankruptcy proceeding
and could choose to seek to renegotiate the agreement on terms less favorable to us or terminate
this agreement. As of the date of this report, we believe that there is a reasonable likelihood
that Delta will assume our code-share agreement in such proceedings. This belief is based primarily
on the continued expansion of the aircraft we fly under our agreement with Delta and our current
business relations with them. Notwithstanding this belief, no assurance can be given that Delta
will assume our code-share agreement or otherwise not seek to renegotiate the terms of the
agreement. If Delta and the
24
Company did renegotiate the terms of the existing agreement, our profitability would be
impacted and liquidity would be reduced. If Delta rejected our code-share agreement in its
bankruptcy proceedings, we would seek to mitigate the effect of such event by seeking alternative
code- share partners, subleasing the aircraft to another carrier or carriers or parking the
aircraft. These options could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition
and results of operations.
Sale Leaseback of Rotable Spare Parts
In August 2005, the Company entered into a ten-year agreement with AAR Corp. (the AAR
Agreement), for the management and repair of certain of the Companys CRJ-200, -700, -900 and
ERJ-145 aircraft rotable spare parts inventory. Under the agreement, the Company sold certain
existing spare parts inventory to AAR for $39.5 million in cash and $21.5 million in notes
receivable to be paid over four years. The AAR agreement was contingent upon the Company
terminating an agreement for the Companys CRJ-200 aircraft rotable spare parts inventory with GE
Capital Aviation Services (GECAS) and including these rotables in the arrangement. The Company
terminated the GECAS agreement and finalized the AAR agreement in November 2005. Upon entering into
the agreement, the Company received $22.8 million, which was recorded as a deposit at September 30,
2005, pending the termination of the GECAS agreement. An additional $15.8 million was received in
the quarter ended December 31, 2005. Under the agreement, the Company is required to pay AAR a
monthly fee based upon flight hours for access to and maintenance and servicing of the inventory.
The agreement also contains certain minimum monthly payments that Mesa must make to AAR. Based on
this arrangement, the Company accounts for the transaction as a service agreement and an operating
lease of rotable spare parts with AAR. The sale of the rotable spare parts resulted in a gain of
$2.1 million, which has been deferred and is being recognized over the term of the agreement. At
termination, the Company may elect to purchase the covered inventory at fair value, but is not
contractually obligated to do so.
In June 2006, the Company entered into a separate two-year agreement with AAR, for the
management and repair of the Companys CRJ-200 aircraft rotable spare parts inventory associated
with its go! operations. Under the agreement, the Company transferred certain existing spare parts
inventory to AAR for $1.2 million in cash. AAR is required to purchase an additional $2.9 million
in rotable spare parts to support the agreement. Under the agreement, the Company is required to
pay AAR a monthly fee based upon flight hours for access to and maintenance of the inventory. At
termination, the Company has guaranteed the fair value of the underlying rotables. Based on this
arrangement, the Company accounts for the transaction as a financing arrangement, thus recording
both the rotable spare parts inventory as an asset and the related payable to AAR as a liability.
Operating Leases
We have significant long-term lease obligations primarily relating to our aircraft fleet.
These leases are classified as operating leases and are therefore excluded from our condensed consolidated
balance sheets. At June 30, 2006, we leased 146 aircraft with remaining lease terms ranging from
one to 18 years. Future minimum lease payments due under all long-term operating leases were
approximately $2.3 billion at June 30, 2006.
3.625% Senior Convertible Notes due 2024
In February 2004, we completed the private placement of senior convertible notes due 2024,
which resulted in gross proceeds of $100.0 million ($97.0 million net). Cash interest is payable on
the notes at the rate of 2.115% per year on the aggregate amount due at maturity, payable
semiannually in arrears on February 10 and August 10 of each year, beginning August 10, 2004, until
February 10, 2009. After that date, we will not pay cash interest on the notes prior to maturity,
and the notes will begin accruing original issue discount at a rate of 3.625% until maturity. On
February 10, 2024, the maturity date of the notes, the principal amount of each note will be
$1,000. The aggregate amount due at maturity, including interest accrued from February 10, 2009,
will be $171.4 million. Each of our wholly owned domestic subsidiaries guarantees the notes on an
unsecured senior basis. The notes and the note guarantees are senior unsecured obligations and rank
equally with our existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness. The notes and the note
guarantees are junior to the secured obligations of our wholly owned subsidiaries to the extent of
the collateral pledged.
The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 40.3737
shares per $1,000 in principal amount at maturity of the notes. This conversion rate is subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances. Holders of the notes may convert their notes only if: (i)
after June 30, 2004, the sale price of our common stock exceeds 110% of the accreted conversion
price for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading
day of the preceding quarter; (ii) on or prior to February 10, 2019, the trading price for the
notes falls below certain thresholds; (iii) the notes have been called for redemption; or (iv)
specified corporate transactions occur. We may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, beginning on
February 10, 2009, at a redemption price equal to the issue price, plus accrued original issue
discount, plus any accrued and unpaid cash interest. The holders of the notes may require us to
repurchase the notes on February 10, 2009 at a price of $583.40 per note plus accrued and unpaid
cash interest, if any, on
25
February 10, 2014 at a price of $698.20 per note plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if
any, and on February 10, 2019 at a price of $835.58 per note plus accrued and unpaid cash interest,
if any.
6.25% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023
In June 2003, we completed the private placement of senior convertible notes due 2023, which
resulted in gross proceeds of $100.1 million ($96.9 million net). Cash interest is payable on the
notes at the rate of 2.4829% per year on the aggregate amount due at maturity, payable semiannually
in arrears on June 16 and December 16 of each year, beginning December 16, 2003, until June 16,
2008. After that date, we will not pay cash interest on the notes prior to maturity, and the notes
will begin accruing original issue discount at a rate of 6.25% until maturity. On June 16, 2023,
the maturity date of the notes, the principal amount of each note will be $1,000. The aggregate
amount due at maturity, including interest accrued from June 16, 2008, will be $252 million. Each
of our wholly owned domestic subsidiaries guarantees the notes on an unsecured senior basis. The
notes and the note guarantees are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with our existing
and future senior unsecured indebtedness. The notes and the note guarantees are junior to the
secured obligations of our wholly owned subsidiaries to the extent of the collateral pledged.
The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 39.727
shares per $1,000 in principal amount at maturity of the notes. This conversion rate is subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances. Holders of the notes may convert their notes only if: (i) the
sale price of our common stock exceeds 110% of the accreted conversion price for at least 20
trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding
quarter; (ii) prior to June 16, 2018, the trading price for the notes falls below certain
thresholds; (iii) the notes have been called for redemption; or (iv) specified corporate
transactions occur. The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, beginning on June 16,
2008, at a redemption price equal to the issue price, plus accrued original issue discount, plus
any accrued and unpaid cash interest. The holders of the notes may require the Company to
repurchase the notes on June 16, 2008 at a price of $397.27 per note plus accrued and unpaid cash
interest, if any, on June 16, 2013 at a price of $540.41 per note plus accrued and unpaid cash
interest, if any, and on June 16, 2018 at a price of $735.13 per note plus accrued and unpaid cash
interest, if any.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, holders of $144.8 million in aggregate principal
amount at maturity ($57.5 million carrying amount) of our 2023 notes converted into shares of Mesa
common stock. In connection with these conversions, we issued an aggregate of 5,751,121 shares of
Mesa common stock and paid approximately $10.5 million to these noteholders. Under the terms of the
notes, each $1,000 of aggregate principal amount at maturity of notes is convertible into 39.727
shares of Mesa common stock at the option of the noteholders under certain circumstances. The
aggregate outstanding principal amount of the notes at maturity prior to these conversions was $240
million. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes have previously been
included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Consequently, issuance of the shares
will not be further dilutive to reported diluted earnings per share.
Interim and Permanent Aircraft Financing Arrangements
We had three aircraft on interim financing with the manufacturer at June 30, 2006. Under
interim financing arrangements, we take delivery and title to the aircraft prior to securing
permanent financing and the acquisition of the aircraft is accounted for as a purchase with debt
financing. Accordingly, we reflect the aircraft and debt under
interim financing on our condensed consolidated balance
sheet during the interim financing period. After taking delivery of the aircraft, it is our
intention to permanently finance the aircraft as an operating lease through a sale and leaseback
transaction with an independent third-party lessor. Upon permanent financing, the proceeds are used
to retire the notes payable to the manufacturer. Any gain recognized on the sale and leaseback
transaction is deferred and amortized over the life of the lease.
At June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, the Company had $82.1 million and $54.6 million,
respectively, in notes payable to an aircraft manufacturer for aircraft on interim financing. These
interim financings agreements are six months in length and provide for monthly interest only
payments at LIBOR plus three percent. The current interim financing agreement with the manufacturer
provides for us to have a maximum of 15 aircraft on interim financing at a given time. Subsequent
to June 30, 2006, the Company began making principal payments on these notes in the amount of $0.1
million per aircraft per month.
Other Indebtedness and Obligations
In 2004, we permanently financed 11 CRJ-900 and five CRJ-700 aircraft with debt. The current
outstanding balance of $334.3 million bears interest at the monthly LIBOR plus three percent and
requires monthly principal and interest payments.
26
In December 2003, we assumed $24.1 million of debt in connection with our purchase of two
CRJ-200 aircraft in the Midway Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. The current amount outstanding of
$23.2 million is due in 2013, bears interest at the rate of 7% per annum through 2008, converting
to 12.5% thereafter, with principal and interest due monthly.
At June 30, 2006, the Company had $11.7 million in restricted cash on deposit with two
financial institutions. In September 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with a financial
institution for a $9.0 million letter of credit facility and to issue letters of credit for landing
fees, workers compensation insurance and other business needs. Pursuant to the agreement, $6.7
million of outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2006 are collateralized by amounts on deposit.
The Company also maintains $5.0 million on deposit with another financial institution to
collateralize its direct deposit payroll obligations.
Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2006, we had $579.4 million of long-term debt (including current maturities).
This amount consisted of $438.3 million in notes payable related to owned aircraft, $137.8 million
in aggregate principal amount of our senior convertible notes due 2023 and 2024 and $3.3 million in
other miscellaneous debt.
The following table sets forth our cash obligations (including principal and interest) as of
June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due by Period |
|
Obligations |
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable related to
CRJ700s and 900s(2) |
|
$ |
11,907 |
|
|
$ |
47,022 |
|
|
$ |
46,235 |
|
|
$ |
45,344 |
|
|
$ |
44,447 |
|
|
$ |
341,513 |
|
|
$ |
536,468 |
|
2003 senior convertible debt
notes (assuming no
conversions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,234 |
|
|
|
99,964 |
|
2004 senior convertible debt
notes (assuming no
conversions) |
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,409 |
|
|
|
182,285 |
|
Notes payable related to
B1900Ds |
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
|
11,693 |
|
|
|
11,693 |
|
|
|
11,693 |
|
|
|
29,299 |
|
|
|
35,277 |
|
|
|
102,578 |
|
Note payable related to
CRJ200s(2) |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
17,952 |
|
|
|
30,702 |
|
Note payable to manufacturer |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
Mortgage note payable |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
Other |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
17,909 |
|
|
|
69,662 |
|
|
|
67,052 |
|
|
|
62,699 |
|
|
|
76,771 |
|
|
|
661,435 |
|
|
|
955,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to manufacturer
interim financing(1)(2) |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
136,592 |
|
|
|
178,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under operating leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash aircraft rental
payments(2) |
|
|
65,210 |
|
|
|
226,012 |
|
|
|
203,673 |
|
|
|
184,229 |
|
|
|
182,541 |
|
|
|
1,427,751 |
|
|
|
2,289,416 |
|
Lease payments on equipment
and operating facilities |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
7,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease payments |
|
|
65,548 |
|
|
|
227,363 |
|
|
|
205,065 |
|
|
|
185,191 |
|
|
|
183,488 |
|
|
|
1,429,905 |
|
|
|
2,296,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future aircraft acquisition
costs(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Rotable inventory financing
commitments(4) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,081 |
|
Minimum payments due under
rotable spare parts
maintenance agreement |
|
|
5,554 |
|
|
|
23,127 |
|
|
|
26,650 |
|
|
|
29,371 |
|
|
|
32,225 |
|
|
|
169,090 |
|
|
|
286,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93,4112 |
|
|
$ |
330,114 |
|
|
$ |
308,705 |
|
|
$ |
287,176 |
|
|
$ |
479,100 |
|
|
$ |
2,397,022 |
|
|
$ |
3,895,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the principal and interest on notes payable to the manufacturer for interim
financed aircraft. For purposes of this schedule, we have assumed that aircraft on interim
financing are converted to permanent financing as debt upon the expiration of the notes with
future maturities included on this line. |
|
(2) |
|
Aircraft ownership costs, including depreciation and interest expense on owned aircraft and
rental payments on operating leased aircraft, of aircraft flown pursuant to our
guaranteed-revenue agreements are reimbursed by the applicable code-share partner. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the estimated cost of commitments to acquire CRJ-900 aircraft. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the principal and interest related to financed rotable spare parts inventory. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In connection with the preparation of these
financial statements, we are required to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue
recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, medical claims reserve, valuation of assets held
for sale and costs to return aircraft and a valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances. Such historical experience and assumptions form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We have identified the accounting policies below as critical to our business operations and
the understanding of our results of operations. The impact of these policies on our business
operations is discussed throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. The
discussion below is not intended to be a comprehensive list of our accounting policies. For a
detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 in the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended September 30, 2005, which
contains accounting policies and other disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Revenue Recognition
The US Airways, United and Delta regional jet code-share agreements are revenue-guarantee
flying agreements. Under a revenue-guarantee arrangement, the major airline generally pays a fixed
monthly minimum amount, plus certain additional amounts based upon the number of flights flown and
block hours performed. The contracts also include reimbursement of certain costs incurred by us in
performing flight services. These costs, known as pass-through costs, may include aircraft
ownership costs, passenger and hull insurance, aircraft property taxes as well as, fuel, landing
fees and catering. The contracts also include a profit component that may be determined based on a
percentage of profits on the Mesa flown flights, a profit margin on certain reimbursable costs as
well as a profit margin based on certain operational benchmarks. We recognize revenue under our
revenue-guarantee agreements when the transportation is provided. The majority of the revenue under
these contracts is known at the end of the accounting period and is booked as actual. We perform an
estimate of the profit component based upon the information available at the end of the accounting
period. All revenue recognized under these contracts is presented at the gross amount billed.
Under our revenue-guarantee agreements with US Airways, United and Delta, we are reimbursed
under a fixed rate per block-hour plus an amount per aircraft designed to reimburse us for certain
aircraft ownership costs. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-08,
Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease, we have concluded that a component of our
revenue under the agreement discussed above is rental income, inasmuch as the agreement identifies
the right of use of a specific type and number of aircraft over a stated period of time. The
amount deemed to be rental income during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $62.5
million and $60.7 million, respectively. The amount deemed to be rental income during the nine
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $185.4 million and $174.8 million, respectively. These
amounts are included in passenger revenue on our condensed consolidated statements of income.
In connection with providing service under our revenue-guarantee agreement with Pre-Merger US
Airways, our fuel reimbursement is capped at $0.85 per gallon. Under this agreement, we have the
option to purchase fuel from a subsidiary of US Airways at the capped rate. As a result, amounts
included in revenue for fuel reimbursement and expense for fuel cost may not
28
represent market rates for fuel for our Pre-Merger US Airways flying. We purchased 0.9 million
gallons and 17.2 million gallons of fuel under this arrangement in the quarters ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively. We purchased 13.9 million gallons and 49.7 million gallons of fuel under
this arrangement in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The US Airways and Midwest Airlines B1900D turboprop code-share agreements are pro-rate
agreements. Under a prorate agreement, we receive a percentage of the passengers fare based on a
standard industry formula that allocates revenue based on the percentage of transportation
provided. Revenue from our pro-rate agreements and our independent operation is recognized when
transportation is provided. Tickets sold but not yet used are included in air traffic liability on
the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
We also receive subsidies for providing scheduled air service to certain small or rural
communities. Such revenue is recognized in the period in which the air service is provided. The
amount of the subsidy payments is determined by the United States Department of Transportation on
the basis of its evaluation of the amount of revenue needed to meet operating expenses and to
provide a reasonable return on investment with respect to eligible routes. EAS rates are normally
set for two-year contract periods for each city.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Amounts billed by us under revenue guarantee arrangements are subject to our interpretation of
the applicable code-share agreement and are subject to audit by our code-share partners.
Periodically our code-share partners dispute amounts billed and pay amounts less than the amount
billed. Ultimate collection of the remaining amounts not only depends upon Mesa prevailing under
audit, but also upon the financial well-being of the code-share partner. As such, we periodically
review amounts past due and records a reserve for amounts estimated to be uncollectible. The
allowance for doubtful accounts was $3.9 million and $8.9 million at June 30, 2006 and September
30, 2005, respectively. If our actual ability to collect these receivables and the actual financial
viability of our partners is materially different than estimated, the Companys estimate of the
allowance could be materially understated or overstated.
Aircraft Leases
The majority of our aircraft are leased from third parties. In order to determine the proper
classification of a lease as either an operating lease or a capital lease, we must make certain
estimates at the inception of the lease relating to the economic useful life and the fair value of
an asset as well as select an appropriate discount rate to be used in discounting future lease
payments. These estimates are utilized by management in making computations as required by existing
accounting standards that determine whether the lease is classified as an operating lease or a
capital lease. All of our aircraft leases have been classified as operating leases, which results
in rental payments being charged to expense over the terms of the related leases. Additionally,
operating leases are not reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheet and accordingly, neither a
lease asset nor an obligation for future lease payments is reflected in our condensed consolidated balance
sheet.
Accrued Health Care Costs
We are currently self-insured up to a cap for health care costs and as such, a reserve for the
cost of claims that have not been paid as of the balance sheet date is estimated. Our estimate of
this reserve is based upon historical claim experience and upon the recommendations of our health
care provider. At June 30, 2006, we accrued $2.7 million for the cost of future health care claims.
If the ultimate development of these claims is significantly different than those that have been
estimated, the accrual for future health care claims could be materially overstated or understated.
Accrued Workers Compensation Costs
Beginning in fiscal 2005, we implemented a new workers compensation program. Under the
program, we are self-insured up to a cap for workers compensation claims and as such, a reserve
for the cost of claims that have not been paid as of the balance sheet date is estimated. Our
estimate of this reserve is based upon historical claim experience and upon the recommendations of
our third-party administrator. At June 30, 2006, we accrued $3.8 million for the cost of workers
compensation claims. If the ultimate development of these claims is significantly different than
those that have been estimated, the accrual for future workers compensation claims could be
materially overstated or understated.
Long-lived Assets, Aircraft and Parts Held for Sale
Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives to
their estimated salvage values using the straight-line method. Long-lived assets to be held and
used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
related carrying amount may be impaired. Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company
records an impairment loss if
29
the undiscounted future cash flows are found to be less than the carrying amount of the asset.
If an impairment loss has occurred, a charge is recorded to reduce the carrying amount of the asset
to fair value. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or
fair value less cost to sell.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
We record deferred tax assets for the value of benefits expected to be realized from the
utilization of alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards and state and federal net operating
loss carryforwards. We periodically review these assets for realizability based upon expected
taxable income in the applicable taxing jurisdictions. To the extent we believe some portion of the
benefit may not be realizable, an estimate of the unrealized portion is made and an allowance is
recorded. At June 30, 2006, we had a valuation allowance of $0.4 million for certain state net
operating loss carryforwards because we believe we will not be able to generate sufficient taxable
income in these jurisdictions in the future to realize the benefits of these recorded deferred tax
assets. We believe we will generate sufficient taxable income in the future to realize the benefits
of our other deferred tax assets. This belief is based upon the Company having had pretax income in
fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 and we have taken steps to minimize the financial impact of our
unprofitable subsidiaries. Realization of these deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating
sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of any net operating loss carryforwards. Although
realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the remaining,
recorded deferred tax assets will be realized. If the ultimate realization of these deferred tax
assets is significantly different from our expectations, the value of its deferred tax assets could
be materially overstated.
AIRCRAFT
The following table lists the aircraft owned and leased by Mesa for scheduled operations as of
June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Passenger |
Type of Aircraft |
|
Owned |
|
Financed |
|
Leased |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Capacity |
Canadair 200/100 Regional Jet |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Canadair 700 Regional Jet |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Canadair 900 Regional Jet |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Embraer 145 Regional Jet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Beechcraft 1900D |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Dash 8-200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Embraer EMB 120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRJ Program
As of June 30, 2006, we operated 113 Canadair Regional Jets (60 CRJ-200/100, 15 CRJ-700 and 38
CRJ-900s).
In January 2004, we exercised options to purchase 20 CRJ-900 aircraft (seven of which can be
converted to CRJ-700 aircraft). To date, we have taken delivery of 13 CRJ-900 aircraft under the
exercise of these options. We also have an option to acquire an additional 60 CRJ-700 or CRJ-900
regional jets in the future.
In June 2006, we launched inter-island service in Hawaii with five CRJ-200s under short-term
operating leases.
ERJ Program
As of June 30, 2006, we operated 36 Embraer 145 aircraft.
Beechcraft 1900D
As of June 30, 2006, we owned 34 Beechcraft 1900D aircraft and were operating 20 of these
aircraft. We lease four of our Beechcraft 1900D to Gulfstream International Airlines, a regional
turboprop air carrier based in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida and lease an additional ten Beechcraft 1900D
aircraft to Big Sky Transportation Co., a regional turboprop carrier based in Billings, Montana
(Big Sky).
Dash-8
As of June 30, 2006, we operated 16 leased Dash-8 aircraft.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we announced that we will add 12 Dash-8 aircraft into
service out of New Yorks JFK airport under our current code-share agreement with Delta. We have
taken delivery of three of these aircraft as of June 30, 2006, and
30
anticipate placing all the aircraft into service during our fiscal fourth quarter. We are
currently in negotiations to lease these aircraft under short-term operating leases.
Aircraft Financing Relationships with the Manufacturer
We had three aircraft on interim financing with the manufacturer at June 30, 2006. Under
interim financing arrangements, we take delivery and title to the aircraft prior to securing
permanent financing and the acquisition of the aircraft is accounted for as a purchase with debt
financing. Accordingly, the Company reflects the aircraft and debt
under interim financing on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet during the interim financing period. After taking delivery of the aircraft, it is our
intention to permanently finance the aircraft as an operating lease through a sale and leaseback
transaction with an independent third-party lessor. Upon permanent financing, the proceeds are used
to retire the notes payable to the manufacturer. Any gain recognized on the sale and leaseback
transaction is deferred and amortized over the life of the lease.
At June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, we had $82.1 million and $54.6 million, respectively,
in notes payable to an aircraft manufacturer for aircraft on interim financing. These interim
financings agreements are typically six months in length and provide for monthly interest only
payments at LIBOR plus three percent. The current interim financing agreement with the manufacturer
provides for Mesa to have a maximum of 15 aircraft on interim financing at a given time. Subsequent
to June 30, 2006, the Company began making principal payments on these notes in the amount of $0.1
million per aircraft per month.
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure about Market Risk.
There have been no material changes in our market risk since September 30, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the
Companys management evaluated, with the participation of the Companys principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act). Based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Companys
chairman of the board and chief executive officer and the Companys executive vice president and
chief financial officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of the date of such evaluation to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to them by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended June 30, 2006, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is in the process of implementing and documenting additional controls over the
preparation of its condensed consolidated statement of cash flows, as a result of improperly presenting
certain changes in other assets within its consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended
September 30, 2005 and its condensed consolidated statement of
cash flows for the quarter ended December 31, 2005.
* * *
31
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In February 2006, Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a complaint against the Company
in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Hawaii (the Bankruptcy Court) alleging
that the Company breached the terms of a Confidentiality Agreement entered into in April 2004 with
the Trustee in Hawaiians bankruptcy proceedings. Hawaiians complaint alleges, among other things,
that the Company breached the Confidentiality Agreement by (a) using the evaluation material to
obtain a competitive advantage over Hawaiian, through the development and implementation of a
business plan to compete with Hawaiian in the inter-island market, and (b) failing to return or
destroy any evaluation materials after being notified by Hawaiian on or about May 12, 2004 that the
Company had not been selected as a potential investor for a transaction with Hawaiian. Hawaiian, in
its complaint, seeks unspecified damages, requests that the Company turn over to Hawaiian any
evaluation material in the Companys possession, custody or control (the Turnover Claim), and an
injunction preventing the Company from providing inter-island transportation services in the State
of Hawaii for a period of two years from the date of such injunctive relief.
The Company vigorously denies Hawaiians allegations and requests for relief contained in its
complaint. In addition to answering Hawaiians complaint, the Company filed a counterclaim
containing three counts against Hawaiian. The Bankruptcy Court dismissed two of these counts, but
the Companys primary allegation that Hawaiians lawsuit against Mesa is itself an anticompetitive
act in violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act remains. Although the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii (the District Court) denied the Companys initial efforts to
immediately withdraw the entire lawsuit from the Bankruptcy Court to the District Court, the
District Court indicated that it may later withdraw the lawsuit or the Companys counterclaim prior
to a trial. A trial is scheduled for April 2, 2007.
In May 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Turnover Claim contained in Hawaiians
complaint. The Bankruptcy Court denied the Companys motion to dismiss the Turnover Claim. The
Company does not believe that this denial has a material impact on the Companys position in the
lawsuit.
In June 2006, Hawaiian requested a preliminary injunction to prevent the Company from issuing
new airline tickets for the Hawaiian inter-island market for a period of one year. In this
request, Hawaiian alleges that initial discovery conducted reveals that the Company breached the
Confidentiality Agreement. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend
against Hawaiians request for a preliminary injunction. If Hawaiian is successful in obtaining a
preliminary injunction, however, the Companys inter-island operations in Hawaii will effectively
cease for one year. A hearing in this regard is scheduled for September 15, 2006.
In the event a preliminary injunction is issued in favor of Hawaiian, the Company believes the
cessation and winding down of its operations in Hawaii could have an adverse impact on its
financial condition or results of operations for a period of approximately six months following
such event. The litigation and claims noted above are subject to inherent uncertainties and the
Companys view of such matters may change in the future.
We are involved in various other legal proceedings and FAA civil action proceedings that the
Company does not believe will have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition
or results of operations, although no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of any such
proceedings.
Item 1.A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended September 30, 2005, and quarters ended December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006, which
could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. We caution the reader
that these risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business
environment and new risk factors emerge from time to time. Management cannot predict such new risk
factors, nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors, nor can we assess the
impact, if any, of such new risk factors on our business or to the extent to which any factor or
combination of factors may impact our business. As a result of litigation relating to our Hawaiian
operations, we may face additional risk factors, including the one identified below. All of these
factors, in addition to the information discussed elsewhere herein, should be carefully considered
in evaluating us and our business:
If we become involved in any material litigation or any existing litigation is concluded in a
manner adverse to us, our earnings may decline.
32
We are, from time to time, subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or
unasserted. Any such claims, whether with or without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive
to defend and could divert managements attention and resources. There can be no assurance
regarding the outcome of current or future litigation.
In February 2006, Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a complaint against the Company
in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Hawaii (the Bankruptcy Court) alleging
that the Company breached the terms of a Confidentiality Agreement entered into in April 2004 with
the Trustee in Hawaiians bankruptcy proceedings. Hawaiians complaint alleges, among other things,
that the Company breached the Confidentiality Agreement by (a) using the evaluation material to
obtain a competitive advantage over Hawaiian, through the development and implementation of a
business plan to compete with Hawaiian in the inter-island market, and (b) failing to return or
destroy any evaluation materials after being notified by Hawaiian on or about May 12, 2004 that the
Company had not been selected as a potential investor for a transaction with Hawaiian. Hawaiian, in
its complaint, seeks unspecified damages, requests that the Company turn over to Hawaiian any
evaluation material in the Companys possession, custody or control (the Turnover Claim), and an
injunction preventing the Company from providing inter-island transportation services in the State
of Hawaii for a period of two years from the date of such injunctive relief.
The Company vigorously denies Hawaiians allegations and requests for relief contained in its
complaint. In addition to answering Hawaiians complaint, the Company filed a counterclaim
containing three counts against Hawaiian. The Bankruptcy Court dismissed two of these counts, but
the Companys primary allegation that Hawaiians lawsuit against Mesa is itself an anticompetitive
act in violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act remains. Although the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii (the District Court) denied the Companys initial efforts to
immediately withdraw the entire lawsuit from the Bankruptcy Court to the District Court, the
District Court indicated that it may later withdraw the lawsuit or the Companys counterclaim prior
to a trial. A trial is scheduled for April 2, 2007.
In May 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Turnover Claim contained in Hawaiians
complaint. The Bankruptcy Court denied the Companys motion to dismiss the Turnover Claim. The
Company does not believe that this denial has a material impact on the Companys position in the
lawsuit.
In June 2006, Hawaiian requested a preliminary injunction to prevent the Company from issuing
new airline tickets for the Hawaiian inter-island market for a period of one year. In this request,
Hawaiian alleges that initial discovery conducted reveals that the Company breached the
Confidentiality Agreement. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend
against Hawaiians request for a preliminary injunction. If Hawaiian is successful in obtaining a
preliminary injunction, however, the Companys inter-island operations in Hawaii will effectively
cease for one year. A hearing in this regard is scheduled for September 15, 2006.
In the event a preliminary injunction is issued in favor of Hawaiian, the Company believes the
cessation and winding down of its operations in Hawaii could have an adverse impact on its
financial condition or results of operations for a period of approximately six months following
such event. The litigation and claims noted above are subject to inherent uncertainties and the
Companys view of such matters may change in the future.
We may be unable to profitably operate our Hawaiian airline service, which could
negatively impact our business and operations.
In June 2006, we launched our independent inter-island Hawaiian airline operation named go!
Providing service in Hawaii will require ongoing investment of working capital by Mesa and
significant management attention and focus.
Further, in light of the costs and risks associated with operating an independent low fare
regional jet airline, we may be unable to operate the Hawaiian airline profitably, which would
negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our results under our revenue-guarantee contracts offer no meaningful guidance
with respect to our future performance in running an independent airline because we have not
previously operated as an independent regional jet carrier in Hawaii. We are operating under a new
brand that will initially have limited market recognition. Future performance will depend on a
number of factors, including our ability to:
|
|
|
establish a brand that is attractive to our target customers; |
33
|
|
|
maintain adequate controls over our expenses; |
|
|
|
|
monitor and manage operational and financial risks; |
|
|
|
|
secure favorable terms with airports, suppliers and other contractors; |
|
|
|
|
maintain the safety and security of our operations; |
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel; and |
|
|
|
|
react to responses from competitors who are more established in the Hawaiian markets. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(A) None
(B) None
(C) The Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 19.4 million
shares of the Companys outstanding common stock, including 10 million shares authorized in
November 2005. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has acquired and retired approximately 8.1 million
shares of its outstanding common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $48.7 million, leaving
approximately 11.3 million shares available for purchase under existing Board authorizations.
Purchases are made at managements discretion based on market conditions and the Companys
financial resources.
The Company repurchased the following shares for $0.5 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
of Shares That |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
May yet be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Announced Plan |
|
the Plan |
June 2006
|
|
|
52,806 |
|
|
$ |
8.84 |
|
|
|
8,112,667 |
|
|
|
11,309,594 |
|
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to vote for Security Holders.
Item 5. Other Information.
None
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Reference |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
* |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MESA AIR
|
|
R GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ GEORGE MURNANE III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Murnane III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and CFO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 9, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibits: |
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
36