close

KBRA Releases Commentary on S&P’s Proposed Updates to Its Insurer Risk-Based Capital Adequacy Methodology and Assumptions

ⓘ This article is third-party content and does not represent the views of this site. We make no guarantees regarding its accuracy or completeness.

On December 6, 2021, S&P Global Ratings released a request for comment (RFC) on proposed updates to its Insurer Risk-Based Capital Adequacy Methodology and Assumptions. The RFC generated significant market controversy in regard to the treatment of non-S&P rated securities held by insurance companies. More specifically, (1) to the extent an insurance company holds a security rated by S&P, that rating will be taken at face value when S&P calculates the insurance company’s capital charge associated with such security; (2) if the security is rated by Moody’s and/or Fitch, the rating will be lowered one to three notches; and (3) if the security is rated by any other credit rating agency (CRA), the security will be notched down to as low as CCC, depending on asset class and country.

The S&P proposal notes it completed a mapping exercise for both Moody’s and Fitch, and the related downward notching for securities rated by these two agencies is the result of this mapping. S&P has publicly told the market it does not have enough data to perform a mapping exercise for all other CRAs. The public comment deadline is scheduled to close on April 29, 2022, following two extensions.

KBRA believes that the capital markets are best served by well informed and reasoned opinions, and that rating agencies are entitled to their views just as much as other market constituents. That said, S&P’s move would equate investment-grade securities with capital charges that are commensurate with deep speculative grade ratings which, in our opinion, is neither well informed nor well-reasoned.

A CCC rating is typically defined as a security that is determined to be near default and at substantial risk of loss. However, the very fact that S&P does not rate a security does not mean that such security is on the verge of default with limited recovery prospects. In this report, KBRA highlights the level of stress required to impair high IG-rated securities in certain selected sectors. Simple math suggests that attributing a CCC capital charge to investment-grade (IG) securities is generally not a fair assessment, especially for high IG categories, regardless of the sector.

Click here to view the report.

About KBRA

KBRA is a full-service credit rating agency registered in the U.S., the EU, and the UK, and is designated to provide structured finance ratings in Canada. KBRA’s ratings can be used by investors for regulatory capital purposes in multiple jurisdictions.

Contacts

Report this content

If you believe this article contains misleading, harmful, or spam content, please let us know.

Report this article

More News

View More

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  251.91
-5.06 (-1.97%)
AAPL  313.71
-2.51 (-0.79%)
AMD  523.55
+17.81 (3.52%)
BAC  62.81
+0.42 (0.68%)
GOOG  327.78
-7.60 (-2.27%)
META  649.69
+36.21 (5.90%)
MSFT  492.82
-1.13 (-0.23%)
NVDA  224.15
-1.58 (-0.70%)
ORCL  162.16
-0.36 (-0.22%)
TSLA  369.02
+0.86 (0.23%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.

Starting at /week.